| An Internalizing score is computed only if all 3 BCFPI Internalizing subscales have been computed. |
|
| For this study, parents responded to the 33 items that make up the Delinquent Behavior and Aggressive Behavior subscales. |
|
| On the other hand, youth in the low negative parental behaviour group were found to reduce their level of risk on 11 of the 12 subscales. |
|
| The BCFPI's child behaviour subscales are also linked to higher scores on the BCFPI Family Impact scale. |
|
| Note that some of the BCFPI's subscales are correlated with higher functional impairment than others. |
|
| In many cases, children evidence t-scores above 70 on more than one of the BCFPI's Mental Health subscales. |
|
| With some notable exceptions, children with high t-scores on several BCFPI subscales may be at higher risk than those with a single problem. |
|
| Following the identification of these five subscales, the items within each factor were examined to explore the internal consistency within each factor, or subscale. |
|
| In contrast to Mehrabian and Epstein, Davis's scale does not calculate an overall value for empathy but calculates a separate score for each of the subscales. |
|
| These subscales describe the extent to which problems may be associated with a breakdown in family networks, conflict between partners, or overall distress regarding the child. |
|
| They often constitute better estimates of overall risk, better measures of service outcome, and better predictors of the longer term course of child problems than individual subscales. |
|
| As noted above, the BCFPI's subscales do not yield diagnoses. |
|
| For example, children with high t-scores on both the Regulation of Attention, Impulsivity, and Activity level and Cooperativeness subscales may be at higher risk than those with either problem alone. |
|
| Factor analysis suggests that the items of the BPI factor well into six subscales, one of which measures antisocial behavior. |
|
| Furthermore, the BIS subscales Inp and Ic were positively correlated with the severity of the SOGS rating scale data from patients. |
|
| We added the Hispanicism and Americanism subscales together, resulting in a biculturalism score that ranged from cultural marginality to monoculturalism to biculturalism. |
|
| Factor analysis showed that the measure has three subscales of depersonalization and derealization, amnesia and absorption and imaginative involvement. |
|
