| This is as expected because collaterality tends to add a third agent to the reciprocated dyads. |
|
| Fig. 4 shows the effect of collaterality for G4 and G5 in the case of the most abundant patterns. |
|
| If strong dyads are favored, the group should have an even number of agents and zero collaterality. |
|
| As is evident in the case of collaterality, group size greatly affects what kinds of patterns emerge. |
|
| For dyadic and triadic leadership patterns, group size dependent differences are insignificant in comparison to the differences caused by collaterality. |
|
| Hyponymy and Collaterality in Brunei Malay Kinship Terminology. |
|
