But it is the bruteness not the fuzziness that does the philosophical work. |
|
But as Devitt points out, there is a more subtle way to appeal to bruteness here, and if Quinean nominalists make use of this, they can block the One Over Many argument. |
|
This and the next subsection consider non-metaphysical replies to the bruteness challenge that can potentially be deployed by a variety of ethical realists, including non-naturalists. |
|