I agree with Jonathan Parker J's judgment in re Barings at page 493 that s.3 of the 1972 Act does not render relevant that which is irrelevant. |
|
That is correct, in re Hallett's Estate, and that is a principle which we say can be taken into account in looking at the context in which the words of 51AA appear. |
|
Brief for the S. E. C. Order in re The Consumers Trust. |
|